- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 August 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1856/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 05.08.2024 Heard Mr. H.R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Additional P.P. for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of Sessions Case No. 109/2024 pending in the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karimganj. Page No.# 2/2 The scanned copy of the case record shows that till now no witness has been examined by the trial court, though 10 (ten) witnesses are shown as prosecution witnesses. Therefore, it is directed that the bail application of the petitioner shall be considered by the trial court, when the trial court examines at least 6 (six) prosecution witnesses. Accordingly, the petitioner is adviced to approach this Court when the trial court examines 6 (six) prosecution witnesses. For the time being, this bail application stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010118372024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1856/2024 ABDUL RAHIM @ ABDUL S/O SHEKH AKLU VILL- NAYAGRAM, UMARPUR, P.S.BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, A S PRODHANI,S. TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. J M A CHOUDHURY(INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.