Sankar Barkakati v. Tarun Barakakati

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010118752023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1753/2023 SANKAR BARKAKATI SO LATE UMESH CHANDRA BARKAKATI, RESIDENT OF TARUN RAM PHUKAN ROAD, CHIRING CHAPORI, PO, PS AND DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786001 VERSUS TARUN BARAKAKATI SO LATE UMESH CHANDRA BARKAKATI, RESIDENT OF TARUN RAM PHUKAN ROAD, CHIRING CHAPORI, PO, PS AND DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N N UPADHYAYA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R S MISHRA Linked Case : SANKAR BARKAKATI VERSUS TARUN BARAKAKATI H Page No.# 2/3 ------------

Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. X X

Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. RS Mishra

B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

26.04.2024

This is an application for condonation of delay of 90 days in preferring the accompanying regular second appeal against the judgment and decree dated

29.11.2022 passed in Title Appeal No.06/2018 by the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Dibrugarh.

¶2This Court has duly perused the grounds which have been assigned in the instant application and also has heard Mr. RS Mishra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

¶3Taking into account the grounds and reasons shown along with the enclosures made therein, this is a fit case for condoning the delay of 90 days in preferring the accompanying appeal.

¶4Accordingly, the instant application stands allowed by condoning the delay of 90 days.

¶5Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3

¶6Registry shall register the accompanying second appeal and list the matter at the column under Order XLI Rule 11 of the CPC as per the convenience of the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant