- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 23 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- AB 1589/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 24.07.2024
Heard Ms. M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners, who are apprehending arrest in connection with Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 105/2024, under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 11(1)
(a)(b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and read with Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2021. Case Diary has been received. Perused the same. Heard both sides. It is submitted by Ms. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners, that both the accused/petitioners already appeared before the I.O. after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 19.06.2024, and co-operated in the investigation of this case. They are still ready and willing to co-operate with the I.O. in the further investigation of this case if they are granted with the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In this context, Mr. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has submitted that both the accused/petitioners already appeared before the I.O. and they co-operated in the investigation of this case and also submitted the Page No.# 3/3 relevant documents before the I.O. Accordingly, he submitted that considering the materials available in the Case Diary and conduct of the accused/petitioners, their prayer may be considered.
After hearing the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides and also considering the entire aspects of the case, nature of allegation as well as the conduct of the accused/petitioners, I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail order, granted to the accused/petitioners vide order dated
19.06.2024, is hereby made absolute in the same terms and conditions.
In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
The Case Diary be sent back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010122252024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/1589/2024o MUKLESURoRAHMANoANDoANRo S/OoABDULoKADIR,oR/OoKANDUMARI,oP.S.-SAMAGURI,oDIST-oNAGAONo (ASSAM) 2:oHANIFAoALI oS/OoMASRABoALI oR/OoMOWAMARI oP.S.-KALIABOR oDIST-NAGAONo(ASSAMo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoAoNATHo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.