VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rup Kumar Rabha v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 June 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1798/2024

Judgment

ORDER

26.06.2024 Heard Mr L N Dihingia, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rup Kumar Rabha, who has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, with prayer for bail, as he is behind bars since 01.06.2024, in connection with Palashbari PS Case No. 182/2024, under Sections 341/306/307 of the Indian Penal Page No.# 2/3 Code, 1860.

¶2Heard Mr D P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State.

¶3It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was provoked to defend his wife as the victim Jibeswar Rabha attempted to commit sexual assault on his wife.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the Case Diary is received without the medical report of the victim. The discharge slip reveals that the victim has sustained injuries on his neck. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection against the bail petition of the petitioner, without perusal of the medico-legal report of the victim.

¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner will abide by any stringent conditions if imposed upon him. The discharge slip also reveals that the victim has been discharged from the hospital after treatment.

¶7Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/-with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup, at Amingaon, under the conditions that:-

i) the petitioner shall not go anywhere near the vicinity of the injured person, Page No.# 3/3

ii) the petitioner shall not exercise threats to the witnesses and maintain the peace, and

iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court, without prior permission. On breach of any of the bail conditions, the interim bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶8Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶9Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010123622024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1798/2024 RUP KUMAR RABHA S/O LATE DEBENDRA RABHA R/O VILL- PURANBARI P.O. RANI, P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN- 781131 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L N DIHINGIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.