VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

The State of Assam and Anr v. Dr. Bhaskar Jyoti Sarmah and Ors

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 September 2024
Bench
Vijay Bishnoi, Suman Shyam
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 2608/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010124092024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2608/2024o InoWAoNo.6994/2024o(FilingoNumber)

1.THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANRo REPoBYoTHEoSECRETRAYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAMoHIGHERoEDUCATIONo TECHNICALoDEPTToDISPURoGUWAHATI 2:oTHEoDIRECTORoOFoTECHNICALoEDUCATIONoASSAM oKAHILIPARAoGUWAHATI-19o VERSUSo

1.DR.oBHASKARoJYOTIoSARMAHoANDoORSo SONoOFoJITENDRAoNATHoSARMAH,oBHAGAWATIPARA,oTITABAR,oJORHAT-o 785630. 2:BARNALIoDAS oDAUGHTERoOFoLATEoBIMALoKANTIoDAS,oSOUTHoHAIBARoGAONoLMDo ROADoP.O.-oHAIBARGAONoNAGAON-o782002. 3:DR.oPARASAoHAZARIKA oDAUGHTERoOFoARUNoCH.oHAZARIKA,oE-7oCSIRoNEISToCOLONYoPULIBORo JORHAT-o785001. 4:MD.oIMTIAZoALAM oSONoOFoMAHAMMADoALI,oSUNDARBARIoNEARoMASJIDoHOUSEoNO.o22o WARDoNO.o2oASSAMoSISHUoKALYANoROASoJALUKBARIoGUWAHATI-o 781014. 5:ANGSHUMANoGOSWAMI oSONoOFoMANOJoKUMARoGOSWAMI,oTULSIoSHARMAoPATHoNEARoJONAKIo SANGHAoSCHOOLoDHALARoSATRAoJAILoROADJORHAT-o785001. 6:DR.oPRATIBHAoBORAH oDAUGHTERoOFoLATEoTULARAMoBORAH,o FLAToNO.o4AoDIAMONDoPLAZAoMALOCUALIoTINIALIoJORHAT-o785001o Page No.# 2/3 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Goswami, Advocate.

Ms. R. Deka, Advocate. – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

02.09.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

The matter comes upon for consideration of this Interlocutory Application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, preferred on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to condone the delay of 3(three) days in preferring the connected writ appeal. Mr. S.S. Goswami, learned counsel has appeared and accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. He has not seriously objected to the application for condonation of delay. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 3(three) days in preferring the connected writ appeal. Hence, the application is allowed and the delay of 3(three) days in preferring the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 3(three) weeks while reflecting the names of the learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants is directed to supply the copy of the connected writ appeal along with requisite documents to the learned Page No.# 3/3 counsel for the respondents during the course of the day.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.