Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Mariyam Bibi and 5 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010124122023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/1728/2023o ORIENTALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLTD.o HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToORIENTALoHOUSE,oAo25/27,oASAFoALIo ROAD,oNEWoDELHIo110002oANDoREGIONALoOFFICEoAToGUWAHATIo7,o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoREGIONALoMANAGER. VERSUSo MARIYAMoBIBIoANDo5oORS.o W/OoLATEoOSMANoGANIo VILLAGEoNO.oBHANDARA,oPOoBHANDARAoBAZAR.oPSoMANIKPUR,oDIST.o BONGAIGAON,oASSAM 2:AMJADoALI oS/OoAHERoALIo VILLAGEoNO.oBHANDARA oPOoBHANDARAoBAZAR.oPSoMANIKPUR oDIST.oBONGAIGAON oASSAM 3:ASHIRUDDINoAHMED oS/OoMD.oABDULoREZZAK o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoDOLAIGAON oPOo oPSoANDoDISToBONGAIGAON oASSAM 4:THEoUNIVERSALoSOMPOoGENERALoINSURANCEoCO.oLTD. oUNIToNO.o1 oCOMoBo1SToFLOOR oADAMSoPLAZA oGSoROAD Page No.# 2/3 CHRISTIAN BASTI BONGAIGAON ASSAM 5:SHRI. NARAYAN PAL S/O R. PAL RESIDENT OF B/28 HARIDARSHAN SOCIETY

NAVA VASTRAL R.T.O ROAD VASTRAL AHMEDABAD 380027 6:SRI NARAYAN R. BAGHEL S/O RAMSEWAK RESIDENT OF B/28 HARIDARSHAN SOCIETY

NAVA VASTRAL R.T.O ROAD VASTRAL AHMEDABAD 38002 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : MS. D. DEVI (R-2)

:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R

27.05.2024

Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel representing Respondent No.1. Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel appears for Respondent No.4 whereas Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned appears for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for Page No.# 3/3 condonation of 21 days of delay in preferring the connected Appeal. The learned counsel representing the respondents have fairly submitted that they have no objection if the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. The connected MAC appeal shall be registered and listed for Admission hearing. The I.A. is disposed of. Copies of the memo of appeal shall be provided to the learned counsel representing the respondents. Office shall show the name of Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel representing Respondent No.1; Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for Respondent No.4 and Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel representing Respondent Nos.2 and 3. JUDGE Comparing Assistant