Md Amir Hussain v. The State of Assam

ORDER Date : 12.06.2023 Heard Mr. I Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J.Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.

¶2The bail application has been preferred by the petitioner, namely, Md. Amir Hussain seeking bail in connection with Biswanath Chariali P.S. Case No. 66/2023 ( GR.No.1157/2023) under Sections 420/427/406/326/207/34 of IPC. Page No.# 2/3

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR dated 14.05.2023 was lodged by the informant, one Md.Hussain Ahmed, wherein it was alleged that on

05.02.2023, there was a fight between the petitioner and co-accused and the informant and his brother in respect of purchase of land and transaction of money between them. In the ensuing fight, it is alleged that the co-accused Md. Anowar Hussain assaulted the brother of the informant who is also named as Anowar Hussain with a khukri and because of which, he suffered grievous injury on his head.

¶4Pursuant thereto the petitioner has been arrested in connection with the aforesaid case. Since the date of arrest, which is 15.05.2023, he has been in custody.

¶5This Court vide the order dated 31.05.2023 had called for the case dairy. Case diary called for is produced before this Court and is carefully perused.

¶6From the Case diary along with injury report, it is seen that injury sustained by the brother of the informant who is named Anowar Hussain is stated to be grievous in nature. Matter is under investigation. The statement of the petitioner along with other witnesses has been recorded.

¶7From the case diary, it is seen that there is no specific incriminating materials in so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶9Accordingly, upon giving my anxious thoughts to the submissions made and the materials available in the case diary, this Court is of the view that considering the period of detention undergone and in view of the absence of any specific materials against the petitioner, the prayer for bail in so far as the petitioner is concerned can be granted.

¶10Accordingly, the bail petition is allowed. The petitioner 1. Md. Amir Hussain is directed to be released on bail forthwith subject to executing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees thirty thousand) only with one local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biswanath Chariali. The bail, Page No.# 3/3 granted however, subject to the following conditions:-

i) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the police and cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required, till completion of investigation.

ii) The petitioner shall not change his residence or place of business, without prior written permission from the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biswanath Chariali.

iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner; and

iv) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person/witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer in connection to this Police Station Case.

¶11If any of the conditions are found to be violated by the petitioner, then the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the accused.

¶12With the above direction, the bail petition is allowed for the petitioner and disposed of.

¶13Return the Case Dairy. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010124492023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2013/2023 MD AMIR HUSSAIN S/O LT. SIKENDER ALI R/O VILL. GOWALTALI P.S BISWANATH CHARIALI DIST BISWANATH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP.BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA