Morjina Khatun v. The State of Assam and 13 Ors

ORDER

04.03.2024. Heard Shri MR Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, who, however, fairly submits that he is not presently in touch with the client. On the other hand, Shri K Gogoi, learned State Counsel, Assam submits that the subject matter pertains to an application for ration card made in the year Page No.# 2/2 2017 whereas her name was reflected in the beneficiary list of the year 2015. He, accordingly submits that there is no cause of action in this writ petition. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case and in absence of any instructions to press this petition, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court if the petitioner can establish existence of any live cause of action.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010125522017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1848/2017 MORJINA KHATUN W/O. MONIRUL ISLAM, VILL. KUKURMARA PT.-II CHAR KUKURMARA, P.O. RADHAMADHAB HAT, P.S. MANKACHAR, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783131. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 13 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES and CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.N I KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI