- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1823/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17.07.2024 Heard Mr. SM Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent. By this application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, the accused petitioner namely, Nekibur Rahman has prayed for bail in connection with Moirabari PS Case No. 74/2024 under Sections 120B/419/420/467/468/471/34 of the Page No.# 2/2 IPC r/w Section 66 C/66D of IT Act . Case diary is received. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody for 64 days. However, considering length of detention, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that Section 467 IPC is not attracted here in this case. Mandatory period of other offences are 60 days which is already over. The learned Addl.P.P. has produced the case diary and submits that material in case diary does not indicate commission of any offence under Section 467 IPC. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the case diary and the averments made in this petition, considering length of detention, this Court is of the considered opinion that further detention of the petitioners in the interest of investigation is not warranted. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioner named above shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Morigaon subject to the following conditions;-
(i) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned CJM, Morigaon without prior written permission from him/her;
(ii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required;
(iii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer or the Court. Violation of any condition shall tentamount to cancellation of bail. This disposes of the bail application. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010126362024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1823/2024 NEKIBUR RAHMAN S/O ABDUL HAI R/O WARD NO. 2, LUCHONABORI P.S. MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.