- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 August 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1865/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 06-08-2024 Heard Ms. G. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner Md. Anuwar Hussain, who has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since
01.06.2024 in connection with Boko Police Station Case No. 190/2024 under Page No.# 2/3 Sections 341/394/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
¶2Heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner was behind bars in connection with another case when the present FIR was registered earlier.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as the petitioner was behind bars at the time of the incident, it was not possible that he was involved in a dacoity with a gang, who also has antecedents of committing dacoity. The petitioner was shown as arrested as he was suspected to be a member of a gang with antecedents of committing dacoity on the Highway.
¶4The allegation that the petitioner is involved in committing dacoity of 320 kg of sugar is absolutely false.
¶5I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. I have also scrutinized the Case Diary. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation. I have considered the submission that the petitioner has pledged to cooperate with the investigation.
¶6Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed.
¶7The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Eleka Magistrate under the conditions that:
(i) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation.
(iii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior Page No.# 3/3 permission.
¶8On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶9In the above terms, this Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶10Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010126882024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1865/2024 MD. ANUWAR HUSSAIN S/O NUR JAMAN R/O VILL- JAHAJAN P.S. JURIYA DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, GOVT. OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. G BORAH, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.