Faridul Islam v. The State of Assam and Anr

ORDER Date : 24 .07. 2024 Heard Mr. AK Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State respondent. Page No.# 2/2 It is submitted by Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner that as per instruction from his client, he wants to withdraw this bail application. However, Mr. Sarma, learned Addl. PP has submitted that scanned copy of the record is available and from the office note it is seen that steps for issuance of notice upon the respondent No. 2 has not been received by the Registry. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this bail application in connection with POCSO Act Case No. 86/2024 under Sections 366/376(2) of the IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 arising out of Bhuragaon P.S. Case No. 42/2024 is dismissed on withdrawal.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010128092024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1883/2024 FARIDUL ISLAM S/O ENNAS ALI R/O BORHOLOUKANDA P.S. BHURAGAON DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:TASLIMA KHATOON (INFORMANT) W/O RUHUL AMIN R/O BALIPARA JANGAL P.S. BHURAGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R K PRADHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA