Arun Kumar Pandey v. The Union of India and 4 Ors

ORDER Date : 28.03.2024

Mr. L. R. Mazumder, learned counsel representing the petitioner, submits that the petitioner had taken back the brief from him 2(two) years ago and accordingly, he is no longer involved in the said matter.

It is seen that there is no further engagement of the counsel in the matter by the petitioner. In view thereof; the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned CGC, is present on behalf of the official respondents.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010128922013 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/914/2013o ARUNoKUMARoPANDEYo S/O-oLT.oRAMoRAYANoPANDEY,oR/OoVILL.-oITWAN,oP.S.-oBIHTA,oDIST.-o PATNA,oBIHAR. VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoando4oORSo THROUGHoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoCENTRALoRESERVEoPOLICEoFORCE,o NEWoDELHI. 2:INSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oNORTHoEASToSECTOR oC.R.P.F. oSHILLONGoMEGHALAYA. 3:DY.oINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oGROUPoCENTRE oC.R.P.F.oDAYAPUR oSILCHAR oP.S.-oUDHARBOND oDIST.-oCACHAR oASSAM. 4:COMMANDANT o147oBATTALION oC.R.P.F.oSILCHAR oDIST.-oCACHAR oASSAM. 5:ASSTT.oCOMMANDANT-CUM-ENQUIRYoOFFICER oC.R.P.F. oSILCHAR Page No.# 2/2 DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. E AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR