- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 May 2023
- Bench
- Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- WP(C) 4112/2018
Judgment
ORDER
25.05.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. J Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Ms. A Verma, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam, as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Golaghat and Ms. U Das, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Golaghat.
¶2The petitioner, namely, Siraj Uddin Khan @ Siraj Uddin Ali Khan was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal Jorhat for rendering an opinion as to whether he is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of Case No.FTG(D)79/2011 wherein an opinion dated 08.05.2018 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.
¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted. Page No.# 3/4
¶4In the writ proceeding, petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1965 of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area under Katlicherra Police Station in the Cachar district which contains the name of Rahmat Ali son of Isub Khan at Sl.No.5 and that of Solema Khatun son of Rahmat Ali at Sl.No.6 and both are shown to be residing in the same House No.74. The petitioner thereafter relies upon the voters list of 1975 of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area under Katlicherra Police Station which contains the name of Rahmat Ali son of Isub Ali at Sl.No.8 and that of Siraj Uddin Kha, son of Rahmat Ali Kha at Sl.No.10 and both are shown to be residing in the same House No.61. It is claimed that Siraj Uddin Kha, son of Rahmat Ali Kha of the 1975 voters list of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area under Katlicherra Police Station is the petitioner himself. If the petitioner proceedee Siraj Uddin Khan @ Siraj Uddin Ali Khan and the Siraj Uddin Kha of the 1975 voters list of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area are one and the same person, the petitioner may have discharged the burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act 1946. But a determination would be required as to whether the two are the same person.
¶5For the purpose, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to examine the voters list of 1965 and 1975 of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area and allow the petitioner to produce any material to prove that the petitioner proceedee Siraj Uddin Khan @ Siraj Uddin Ali Khan and the Siraj Uddin Kha of the 1975 voters list are one and the same person.
¶6The respondents in the Home Department may also make their own verification as to whether the writ petitioner/proceedee Siraj Uddin Khan @ Siraj Page No.# 4/4 Uddin Ali Khan and the Siraj Uddin Kha of the 1975 voters list of village Apin Grant Govt. Requisition Area are one and the same person and submit a report before the Tribunal, if so advised.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 27.06.2023.
¶8The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated
08.05.2018 of the Foreigners Tribunal Jorhat in Case No.FTG(D)79/2011 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.
¶9Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.
¶10Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
¶11Send back the LCR.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010133232018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/4112/2018o SIRAJoUDDINoKHANo@oSIRAJoUDDINoALIoKHANo S/O-oLToRAHMAToALIoKHANo@oRAHMAToALI,oR/O-oVILL-oGULAMPATTIo GAON,oPO,oPSoANDoDIST-oGOLAGHATo(ASSAM) VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,oSHASTRIoBHAWAN,oNEWoDELHI-1 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-6 3:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oGOLAGHAT oPOoANDoDIST-oGOLAGHATo(ASSAM) 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oGOLAGHAT oPOoANDoDIST-oGOLAGHATo(ASSAM) 5:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNEWoDELHI 6:THEoSTATEoCOORDINATOR oNATIONALoREGISTRARoOFoCITIZENSo(NRC) oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oJoLASKARo Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.