VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Aminul Haque @ Aminul Hussain and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 September 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 1783/2024

Judgment

ORDER

02.09.2024

¶1Heard learned counsel Mr. H. A. Ahmed for the petitioners, namely (i) Page No.# 2/3 Aminul Haque @ Aminul Hussain, and (ii) Ahida Khatun.

¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail as they are apprehending arrest in connection with Patacharkuchi Police Station Case No. 80/2024 under Sections 326/307/498(A)/34 of the IPC.

¶3Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4The allegation against the petitioners is that they have been subjecting the victim to cruelty and domestic violence was prevalent in the household. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner No. 1 is the elder brother of the prime accused and petitioner No. 2, who is the wife of Aminul Haque @ Aminul Hussain, is the sister in law of the prime accused. It is submitted that the prime accused have already been arrested and enlarged on bail. The petitioners have been incriminated in an ominous manner. The petitioners are not complicit.

¶5Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioners.

¶6I have scrutinized the Case Diary. The injuries sustained by the victim have been described as simple injuries caused by blunt object.

¶7I have considered the submission on behalf of the petitioners that the Page No.# 3/3 petitioners are willing to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation and to abide by any stringent bail condition, if imposed upon them. The petitioners are local residents and not flight risks.

¶8Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioners shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, under the conditions that:

(i) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 1 (One) week and co-operate with the investigation,

(ii) The petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, and

(iii) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the jurisdictional Court without prior permission. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.

¶9Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010136142024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1783/2024 AMINUL HAQUE @ AMINUL HUSSAIN AND ANR S/O MAGBUL HUSSAIN, VILL- DATIRBORI, P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI, DIST- BAJALI, ASSAM 2: AHIDA KHATUN W/O AMINUL HUSSAIN VILL- DATIRBORI P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI DIST- BAJALI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MR H A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.