- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 10 July 2024
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2006/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 11.07.2024
Heard Mr. A.Z. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned APP for the State. Page No.# 2/4
¶2The petitioner, who was arrested on 29.06.2024, is seeking regular bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with South Salmara P.S. Case No. 108/2024 under sections 147/ 148/ 149/ 353/ 333/ 336/ 325/ 326/ 307/ 365/ 379/ 411 IPC read with Section 13(i)/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.
¶3The learned APP has produced the case diary and has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that there are sufficient materials in the case diary to implicate the petitioner of committing offence of bringing 20 numbers of stolen buffalo and on being intercepted by the police personnel, the concerned home guard was assaulted and he was recovered in an unconscious condition from the abandoned place. The learned APP has submitted that the police had recovered the unconscious home guard and thereafter, the accused persons were apprehended for attacking the concerned home guard who had suffered serious and grievous injuries in the head and other parts of the body.
¶4It is further submitted that in respect of the same offence, two police cases are registered being Sukchar PS Case No. 37/2024 under sections 120B/ 47/ 365/ 325/ 379/ 506 IPC as well as South Salmara PS Case No. 268/2023 under sections 379/411 IPC. It is also submitted that several of the named accused persons are absconding.
¶5We take note of the order dated 26.06.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in BA 1723/2024, by which one of the co-accused in connection with South Salmara PS Case No. 109/2024 was released on bail. We also take note of the contents of the said order wherein the Court had recorded that two FIRs have similar allegation, except the number of accused was reduced in the said subsequent FIR. We also take note of the order dated 19.05.2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Pet. No. 601/2022, wherein this Court had held that in the schedule appended to the Assam Cattle Preservation Page No.# 3/4 Act, 2021, the animal "Buffalo" is not included.
¶6Therefore, although the case diary implicates the petitioner of assaulting the concerned home guard and other police personnel and leaving the said Home Guard unconscious in an abandoned place, however, the Court is of the considered opinion that further custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary. Hence, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, namely, Rakibul Islam SK @ Rukun Uddin in connection with the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar. The bail is granted on the following conditions:
¶1The petitioner shall make himself available to the police or any other investigating agency or Court in the present case as and when required.
¶2The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. He shall not, in any manner, try to overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witness.
¶3The petitioner shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation/trial.
¶4The petitioner shall not misuse their liberty in any manner.
¶5The petitioner shall appear before the I/O once in a month till his appearance is no longer required or till charge-sheet is filed, whichever is earlier.
¶7This application stands disposed of. Page No.# 4/4
¶8Case diary is returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010137332024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2006/2024 RAKIBUL ISLAM SK @ RUKUN UDDIN S/O ROFIQUL ISLAM, VILL- BERABHANGA PT-I, P.S.-SUKCHAR, DIST- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783135 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.