- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 April 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 2570/2022
Judgment
ORDER Date : 01.05.2024
¶1From the Office Note, it reveals that the Respondent No.3 had expired. Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants submits that the Respondent No.3 is the mother of the Respondent Nos. 4 and
5.
¶2Taking into account that the estate of the Respondent No.3 is duly represented, the learned counsel submitted that there is no further necessity of substituting the legal representatives of the Respondent No.3
¶3Taking into account the said submission, the name of the Respondent No.3 is struck off.
¶4This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 22 days in preferring the accompanying Second Appeal Page No.# 4/4 against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge, No.1, Cachar at Silchar in Title Appeal No.18/2018.
¶5This Court has duly perused the grounds as assigned in the instant application and has also heard Mr. H. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents who offers no objection.
¶6Taking into account the above, this Court condones the delay of 22 days in preferring the accompanying Second Appeal.
¶7Accordingly, I.A. stands disposed of.
¶8Registry is directed to register the accompanying Second Appeal and list the matter in the column of Order XLI Rule 11 on 13.05.2024.
¶9Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, the learned counsel shall serve a copy of the Memo of Appeal to Mr. H. Das, the learned counsel representing the Respondents.
¶10The Registry is further directed the reflect the name of Mr. H. Das as the counsel for the Respondents.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010137752022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2570/2022o ONoTHEoDEATHoOFoMONIoDHUBIoHISoLEGALoHEIRSoSRIoCHANDRAo SEKHARoDHUBIoANDo2oORSo S/OoLATEoMONIoDHUBI,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLABAKPARoPARToIII,oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR,oDISTo CACHAR,oASSAM,o788098 2:oSRIoDILIPoKUMARoDHUBI oS/OoLATEoSRINANDANoDHUBI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLABAKPARoPARToIII oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAM o788098 3:oSRIoJAGANNATHoKUMARoDHUBI oS/OoLATEoSRINANDANoDHUBI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLABAKPARoPARToIII oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAM o78809o VERSUSo SMT.oFULMATIoROYoANDo7oORSo W/OoLATEoSANAToROY,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLALANGoKITTAoLABAKPAR,oPOoANDoPSo LAKHIPUR,oDISToCACHAR,oASSAMo788098 2:SRIoSUMANTAoROY PageoNo.#o2/4 oS/OoLATEoSANAToROY o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLALANGoKITTAoLABAKPAR oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAMo788098 3:SMTIoSARATHIoTANTI oW/OoLATEoMAHINDRAoTANTI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLALANGoCHAoBAGICHA oTARAPURoSHIBBARIoROAD oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAMo788098 4:SRIoAKALUoTANTI oS/OoLATEoMOHINDRAoTANTI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLALANGoCHAoBAGICHA oTARAPURoSHIBBARIoROAD oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAMo788098 5:SRIoBIPULoTANTI oS/OoLATEoMOHINDRAoTANTI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoLALANGoCHAoBAGICHA oTARAPURoSHIBBARIoROAD oPOoANDoPSoLAKHIPUR oDISToCACHAR oASSAMo788098 6:SMTIoRAMPIYARIoBARETHA oW/OoLATEoKISHOREoBARETHA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoANDoPOoDERBYoTEAoESTATE oDISToCACHAR oASSAMo788112 7:SMTIoSUPTAoBARETHA oW/OoANUPoBARETHAo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoANDoPOoDERBYoTEAoESTATE oDISToCACHAR Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 788112 8:SMTI SHANTI DHUBI W/O PRATAP DHUBI RESIDENT OF MALUGRAM SILCHAR WARD NO. 1 DIST CACHAR ASSAM 78800 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Das, Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.