VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Biren Sarmah v. Smti. Minakshi Das Nath, A.C.S. and Anr

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 June 2024
Bench
N. Unni Krishnan Nairauthor
Case no.
Cont.Cas(C) 404/2023

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010139202023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCont.Cas(C)/404/2023o BIRENoSARMAHo S/OoLATEoGUNABHIRAMoSARMA,oR/OoKATAHBARI,oP.S.-AMBARI,oFATASIL,o DIST-KAMRUPo(M),oASSAM VERSUSo SMTI.oMINAKSHIoDASoNATH,oA.C.S.oANDoANRo DIRECTORoOFoCULTURALoAFFAIRS,oGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oRABINDRAo BHAWAN,oAMBARI,oGUWAHATI-781001 2:SUDHARSHANoTHAKUR oSECRETARY oSRIMANTAoSANKARDEVoKALAKHSETRAoSOCIETY oPANJABARI oGUWAHATI-78103o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oSoSoBAROOAHo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMR.oRoSARMAo(R-2)oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HONOURABLEoMR.oJUSTICEoN.oUNNIoKRISHNANoNAIR ORDERo Dateo:oo26.06.2024 oooooooooooooooo Heard ; Mr.S.S.Baruah, ; learned ; counsel ; for ; the ; petitioner ; and ; Mr. R.Sharma;and;Ms.;M.Bhataharjee,;learned;counsel;appearing;for;their;respective respondents. Page No.# 2/3 The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the direction as passed by this court vide order dated 26.09.2022 in WP (C) No. 4751/2018 was complied with vide issuance of speaking order 21.10.2022 and therein has held that the petitioner is entitled to both pension and gratuity. The said order was enclosed as Annexure-II to the contempt petition. A consideration of the order dated 26.09.2022, in the light of the direction passed by this court, this court is of the considered view that the directions as passed in this matter by this court has been complied with and there is no willful and deliberate violation of the directions so passed. The counsel for the respondents have also brought on record the documents envisaging receipt of the gratuity amount by the petitioner . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the gratuity amount as well as pension amounts have been released to him without any interest for the delayed payment. The said contention not being covered by the directions passed by this court vide order dated 26.09.2022, no further orders in this connection can be passed by this Court in the contempt petition. However, while the contempt petition stands closed, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate application highlighting his further grievances in the matter including the question of application of interest on account of the delayed payment of pension and gratuity to him in the matter.

JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.