Mukul Bora v. The State of Assam and 7 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010139362024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWA/239/2024o MUKULoBORAo S/O-oLT.oBOGAIoRAMoBORA,oR/O-oVILLAGE-oMORONGIAL,oPOSToOFFICE-o CHOTAHAIBOR,oPOLICEoSTATION-oSADAR,oDISTRICT-oNAGAON,oASSAM,o PIN-o782003. VERSUSo

1.THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo7oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCHIEFoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFo ASSAM,oDISPUR,oJANATAoBHAWAN,oGUWAHATI-6. 2:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oPERSONNELoDEPARTMENT oDISPURoJANATAoBHAWANoGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oDEPARTMENToOFoSOCIALoJUSTICEoANDoEMPOWERMENT oDISPURoJANATAoBHAWANoGUWAHATI-6. 4:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oHEALTHoANDoFAMILYoWELFAREoDEPARTMENT oDISPURoJANATAoBHAWANoGUWAHATI-6. 5:THEoDIRECTORoOFoSECONDARYoEDUCATIONoASSAM oKAHILIPARAoGUWAHATI-19. 6:THEoSTATEoLEVELoRECRUITMENToCOMMISSIONoFORoCLASS-IVoPOSTS oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSoCHAIRMAN/oSECRETARY oASSAMoADMINISTRATIVEoSTAFFoCOLLEGE oJAWAHARNAGARoKHANAPARAoGUWAHATI-22. 7:THEoJOINToDIRECTORoOFoHEALTHoSERVICESoNAGAON oDIST.-oNAGAONoASSAM-o782001. Page No.# 2/3 8:THE MEDICAL BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL-CUM-CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL GUWAHATI-32 ASSAM For the Appellant : Mr. S.K. Roy, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. R.B. Bora, Government Advocate, Assam. : Ms. D. Jain, Advocate for Department of Social Justice & Empowerment for respondent No.3. : Mr. D. Upamanyu, Standing Counsel, Health Department for respondent Nos.4, 7 & 8. : Ms. H. Terangpi, Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department for respondent No.5. : Mr. B. Choudhury, Standing Counsel, SLRC for respondent No.6. – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

31.07.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

Heard Mr. S.K. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant. We have also heard Ms. R.B. Bora, Government Advocate, Assam; Ms. D. Jain, learned counsel for the Department of Social Justice & Empowerment; Mr. D. Upamanyu, Standing Counsel, Health Department; Ms. H. Terangpi, Standing Counsel, Department of School Education, Assam and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, SLRC appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellant upon instruction from his client, wants to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge, in accordance with law. The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel representing the respondents. In view of above, prayer stands allowed. Page No.# 3/3 The writ appeal stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant