Sadananda Gogoi v. The State of Assam and 2 Ors

ORDER Date : 25.09.2024

None appears on behalf of the Petitioner on call.

¶2This Court has also perused the affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2 wherein it has been stated under what conditions, the security coverage provided earlier to the petitioner was withdrawn.

¶3This Court has also perused the Minutes of the SSRC Meeting dated

27.04.2011 wherein it has been mentioned that there is no requirement for allotment of any PSO to the Petitioner. Further to that, in the further SSRC Meetings which have been mentioned in the said affidavit shows that there is no threat perception.

¶4Under such circumstances, this Court finds no ground for issuance of a writ as sought for and as such, the instant writ petition stands dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010141172017 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5654/2017o SADANANDAoGOGOIo S/O.oLT.oDHIRENoGOGOI,oR/O.o848oDR.oZAKIRoHUSSAINoROAD,oMOTORIA,o GUWAHATI-781036. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoando2oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oandoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oHOMEoando POLITICALoDEPTT.,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-781006. 2:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI-781006. 3:THEoCOMMISSIONERoOFoPOLICE oCITYoPOLICE oGUWAHATI oPANBAZAR oGUWAHATI-1o For;the;Petitioner(s);;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;None;appears. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooFor;the;Respondent(s);;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;Mr.;S.;Baruah,;Standing;Counsel oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH