- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 February 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 2294/2023
Judgment
ORDER
15.02.2024 Heard Mr A Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ibrahim Ali.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Bogribari PS Case No. 108/2022, under Sections 379/411/34 IPC, read with Sections 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Page No.# 2/2 Act, 2021 (GR Case No. 854/2022)
¶3Heard Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶4Scanned copies of the LCR as well as the Case Diary are received, which reveal that charge sheet has been laid against the petitioner and the case is at present registered as Sessions Case No. T-2/108/2023.
¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar.
¶6The petitioner, who was on interim bail has appeared before the IO and has cooperated with the investigation.
¶7It is submitted that custodial detention of the petitioner may not be required, as investigation is complete. The petitioner is willing to abide by any bail conditions, and cooperate with the trial.
¶8Considering all aspects, petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court whenever summons is issued and apply for bail, which may be considered by the learned trial Court, as per law.
¶9In terms of the above observations, the bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010142012023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2294/2023 IBRAHIM ALI S/O DHANIJA SHEIKH R/O VILL- 212 JAGIRMOHAN PART-I, P.O. AND P.S. BILASHIPARA, IN THE DISTRICT OF DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M J QUADIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.