VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Moromi Begum v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2089/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 02.08.2024

Heard Mr. F.Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D.P.Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent. By filing this petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakshya Sanhita, 2023 the accused-petitioner, namely, Moromi Begum has prayed for Page No.# 2/3 grant of bail in connection with Chhaygaon P.S. Case No.202/2024 under Sections 21(b)/ 29 of NDPS Act. Case diary is not received. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 33.37 grams of suspected narcotics drugs including a plastic pouch was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which falls in the intermediate quantity wherein the mandatory period of punishment for such offence is 60 days. The petitioner has been in judicial custody for last 58 days since his arrest on 06.06.2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a lady and on the day of her arrest, her husband was not at home. However, considering length of detention, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. The learned Addl.P.P. submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody for 58 days and as such, length of detention may be considered. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering length of detention of the petitioner who is in judicial custody for last 58 days, further custodial interrogation of the petitioner in the interest of investigation is not warranted. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioner named above shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Kamrup (Amingaon), subject to the following conditions;-

(i) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge, Kamrup (Amingaon) without prior written permission from him/her;

(ii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Page No.# 3/3 Officer as and when required;

(iii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer or the Court. Violation of any condition shall tentamount to cancellation of bail. This disposes of the bail application.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142392024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2089/2024 MOROMI BEGUM W/O NOOR ALOM, R/O VILL- JORSHIMULI, P.S.-CHHAYGAON, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, MR. S K M ALOMGIR,MR A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.