VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ashrafuz Zaman v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 July 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2093/2024

Judgment

ORDER

22.07.2024

¶1Heard learned counsel Mr. A. M. Bora for the petitioner Ashrafuz Zaman.

¶2This application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the BNSS with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 03.07.2024 in connection Page No.# 2/3 with

Dispur

P.S.

Case

No.

676/2024

under

Sections 87/115(2)/117(2)/134/303(2)/324(2) of the BNSS.

¶3Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the victim inside his car near Narayana Hospital with an iron rod and with an intent to commit murder. He broke her mobile phone and took away the same. The petitioner has threatened the victim with dire consequences. The FIR has been lodged by the victim's father.

¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶6It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the victim and the petitioner were in a love relationship. Both of them are students of Law college.

¶7The petitioner is willing to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation. The petitioner is willing to abide by any stringent bail conditions, if imposed upon him.

¶8It is submitted that further custodial detention may not be required for progress of investigation.

¶9Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, Petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand), with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M), under the conditions that:

(i) the petitioner shall not go anywhere near the Page No.# 3/3 vicinity of the victim,

(ii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission, and

(iii) the petitioner shall not temper with the evidence and try to influence the witnesses.

¶10On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand automatically cancelled.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142482024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2093/2024 ASHRAFUZ ZAMAN S/O GULENUR AHMED, R/O WARD NO. 1, MANGALDOI, DARRANG, P.S.- MANGALDOI, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BORA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.