VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Krishna Mandal v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
6 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2106/2024

Judgment

ORDER

07.08.2024

Heard Ms. M. Das, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 By filing this petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, the accused-petitioner, namely, Krishna Mandal, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.66/2024 under Sections 354A/201 of IPC, R/W Section 10/19 of POCSO Act (corresponding G.R. No. 149/2024). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been languishing in judicial custody for last 63 days since his arrest on

05.06.2024 and charge-sheet has not yet been submitted. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for default bail. Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and submitted that there is material against the petitioner but charge-sheet has not yet been submitted and he admitted that the petitioner has completed the mandatory period of 60 days in custody. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.40,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (POCSO), Charaideo. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge (POCSO), Charaideo without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing Page No.# 3/3 such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142852024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2106/2024 KRISHNA MANDAL S/O LATE BRINDABAN MANDAL, R/O BHABANIPUR, WARD NO. 03, P.S.- SONARI, DIST- CHARAIDEO, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:MD. ASLAM KURESHI S/O MD. AMIN KURESHI R/O SONARI TOWN WARD NO. 3 P.S.-SONARI DIST- CHARAIDEO PIN-78569 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR B ISLAM,MR. N GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.