- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 August 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 1910/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 19-08-2024
Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner Mahammad Ali, who has filed this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending Page No.# 2/3 arrest in connection with Satgaon Police Station Case No. 104/2024 under Sections 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
¶2Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.
¶3The allegation against the petitioner is that he is involved in removing the informant's TATA 407 pickup vehicle bearing registration No. AS-01-HC-7134 on
08.07.2024 at about 5:22 AM with the aid of recovery crane. This activity was caught in the CCTV footage of a hotel situated below the SBI Narengi Branch.
¶4Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection against the prayer for bail stating that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner.
¶5It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner earlier had a business of selling scraps but now the petitioner has stopped selling scraps.
¶6I have scrutinized the Case Diary. Indeed there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. The merits of this case are not brought to the fore and the statements of the witnesses are not discussed at this stage as investigation is still under progress. I have considered the submissions that the petitioner is willing to cooperate with the remaining part of the investigation and to abide by any stringent bail conditions if imposed upon him.
¶7The petitioner was granted interim bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.07.2024. The petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement has been recorded and it appears that he has cooperated with the investigation.
¶8Considering the submissions at the bar, I deem it proper to allow the Page No.# 3/3 petition. Interim bail order dated 25.07.2024 is hereby made absolute under the additional conditions that:
(i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer after every 15th days;
(ii) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged; and
(iii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission.
¶9On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.
¶10In terms of the above observations, this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of.
¶11Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010145302024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1910/2024 MAHAMMAD ALI S/O LATE SAMIR ALI @ CHAMIR ALI R/O VILL- SALIKAJHAR P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM PIN- 784148 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. F A HASSAN,MR. RAJARSHEE DE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.