- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 June 2023
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- AB 2329/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 30.06.2023
¶1Heard Mr. S. Nag, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by one Sri Devesh Mishra, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Kamrup(M), BI(E.O.) Case No. 21/2017 under Section 419/420/406/468/471 of Page No.# 2/3 the Indian Penal Code.
¶3The accusation against the present petitioner is that he is an Advocate by profession and is an empanelled counsel of Central Bank of India and he on
21.01.2015, had submitted a legal scrutiny report to the Central Bank of India in connection with a loan by one Atish Chandra Bagchi. It is also stated that irregularities were found in the account of the said Atish Chandra Bagchi and in that connection the Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Assam Regional Office, Jorhat has lodged a complaint on 30.10.2017 before the Director, Bureau of Investigation, Economic Offences Wing.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that in connection with the said case, the petitioner received two notices on 20.06.2023 and asking him to appear before the Bureau of Investigation on 17.06.2023 and similarly another notice was received by him on 27.06.2023 asking him to appear before the Bureau of Investigation on 23.06.2023 in connection with BI(E.O.) Case No. 21/2017.
¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as both the notices were received by the petitioner after the date mentioned in the said notice, on which he was required to appear, it was not possible on his part to appear before the Bureau of Investigation. Now the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the said case.
¶6I have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
¶7Considering the submissions of learned counsel for both sides as well as on perusal of the documents available on record and also considering the fact that the notices received by the present petitioner which were issued to him by Bureau of Investigation were post-dated notices, the petitioner is directed to Page No.# 3/3 appear before the Bureau of Investigation (E.O.) within 10(ten) days from the date of this order and shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer for the said case, if he does so within the stipulated period of time, in the event of his arrest in connection with BI(E.O.) Case No. 21/2017, he shall be allowed to go on bail of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.
¶8With the above observation, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010146622023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2329/2023 DEVESH MISHRA S/O- SRI SARV DEO MISHRA, RESIDENT OF 2ND FLOOR, CHANDRA COMPLEX, UCO BANK BUILDING, RANGAGORA ROAD, TINSUKIA- 786125, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N D SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.