- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 657/2024
Judgment
ORDER
26.07.2024
¶1Heard learned counsel Mr. R. Ali for the applicant, Javed Akhtar.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant Mr. R. Ali has filed this Page No.# 2/2 application for rectification of the typographical error.
¶3Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.
¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the typographical error had occurred in the B.A. application No. 2082/2024 wherein, instead of typing the Police Station as 'Barpeta Road' Police Station, the Police Station was inadvertently mentioned as 'Barpeta Police Station.'
¶5This typographical error is allowed to be rectified and wherein the P.S. is mentioned as 'Barpeta Police Station,' the error may be corrected and typed as 'Barpeta Road' Police Station, and thereafter be considered as Barpeta Road Police Station.
¶6In terms of the above observations, petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010147382024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/657/2024 JAVED AKHTAR, S/O- SAHALOM KHANDAKAR, VILL-PADUMPURI, P.S- DOLGAON, DIST- DARRANG , ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : Hannan Ali Ahmed Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.