- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 July 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 2205/2024
Judgment
ORDER
31.07.2024
Heard Mr. M.S. Alam, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner. None appears for the respondents when the matter is called. Page No.# 3/4 This is an application filed for modification of the Judgment and Order dated
18.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1679/2024. It is the specific case of the applicant that though this Court while passing the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2024 in the open Court clearly provided that the Insurance Company shall reconsider the request of the applicant/petitioner for surrendering the subject insurance policy within a period of one month. However, the said period has been inadvertently left out in the body of the final Judgment and Order. Accordingly, the instant application has been filed for adding the one month time period within which the respondent No. 2/Insurance Company shall reconsider the subject request of the applicant, as provided in para 13 the aforesaid Judgment and Order. Heard the applicant and perused the materials available on record. It appears that 'the period of one month' has been inadvertently left out in the body of the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2024, which was dictated in open Court in presence of both the parties, in the writ petition. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, it is provided that in paragraph 13 of the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2024 in WP(C) No. 1679/2024, the words 'within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order' be added at the end after the word 'humanitarian approach'. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Accordingly, this order shall be considered to be apart of the earlier Order dated
18.07.2024 passed by this Court.
JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010147652024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2205/2024o PARESHoKUMARoCHUTIAo@oPORESHoKUMARoCHUTIAo@oPORESHoCHUTIAo S/OoLATEoKAMALoKANTAoCHUTIAo@oKAMALoCHUTIA,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoSONAPURoNAMGHARoROAD,oDULIAJANoPOoANDo PSoDULIAJAN,oDISToDIBRUGARH,oASSAMo786602 VERSUSo THEoINSURANCEoOMBUDSMANoANDoANRo (STATESoOFoASSAM,oMEGHALAYA,oMANIPURoMIZORAM,oARUNACHALo PRADESH,oNAGALANDoANDoTRIPURA)oJEEVANoNIVESH,o5THoFLOOR,o NEARoPANoBAZAR,oOVERoBRIDGE,oS.SoROAD,oGUWAHATIo01 2:THEoKOTAKoMAHINDRAoLIFEoINSURANCEoCOMPANY oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoBRANCHoMANAGER oKOTAKoMAHINDRAoLIFEoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoCITYoTOWER oH.SoROAD oDIBRUGARH oASSAMo78600o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMD.oSoALOM,oMRoSoJoSHAMIM,MR.oMoSoALAM,MS.oAoBEGUMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMRoSoDAS,oo oLinkedoCaseo:oWP(C)/1679/2024 PARESHoKUMARoCHUTIAo@oPORESHoKUMARoCHUTIAo@oPORESHoCHUTIA S/OoLATEoKAMALoKANTAoCHUTIAo@oKAMALoCHUTIA o Page No.# 2/4 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SONAPUR NAMGHAR ROAD DULIAJAN PO AND PS DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786602 VERSUS THE INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN AND ANR (STATES OF ASSAM MEGHALAYA MANIPUR MIZORAM ARUNACHAL PRADESH NAGALAND AND TRIPURA) JEEVAN NIVESH 5TH FLOOR NEAR PAN BAZAR OVER BRIDGE S.S ROAD GUWAHATI 01 2:THE KOTAK MAHINDRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER KOTAK MAHINDRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY CITY TOWER H.S ROAD DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786001 ------------ Advocate for : MD. S ALOM Advocate for : MR S DAS (R-2) appearing for THE INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN AND ANR BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.