VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Hasina Perven Choudhury v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 September 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 3760/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010148652024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3760/2024o HASINAoPERVENoCHOUDHURYo D/O-oLATEoMASABoALIoCHOUDHURY,o R/O-oVILLAGE-oSAYEDBONDoPART-III,o P.O.-oKALIBARIoBAZAR,o P.S.-oHAILAKANDI,o DISTRICT-oHAILAKANDI,oASSAM,o PIN-o788150. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo THROUGHoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARY,o TOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,o SCHOOLoEDUCATIONo(ELEMENTARY),o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI-o781006. 2:THEoDIRECTORoOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-o781019. 3:THEoDISTRICToELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoOFFICER oHAILAKANDI oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oHAILAKANDIo DISTRICT-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM. 4:THEoDEPUTYoINSPECTORoOFoSCHOOLS oHAILAKANDIoDISTRICToCIRCLE oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oHAILAKANDIo DISTRICT-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM. 5:THEoDISTRICToLEVELoCOMMITTEEoFORoAPPOINTMENToONo COMPASSIONATEoGROUND Page No.# 2/2 REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI P.O. AND P.S.- HAILAKANDI DISTRICT-HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S SEAL, MS. J CHETTRY,MS. S KANUNGOE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU,

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK O R D E R

11.09.2024 Heard Ms. J. Chettry, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, Department of School Education (Elementary), Assam for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 as well as Mr. G. Pegu, learned Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the respondent No.5.

¶2On instruction of the petitioner Hasina Perven Choudhury, her counsel Ms. S. Seal has prayed for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file afresh for a fresh cause of action, to which the learned counsels for the respondent have no objection.

¶3Prayer is allowed.

¶4The writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn.

¶5Liberty, as prayed for, is granted.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.