VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rezzak Mallik and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
20 August 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2184/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 21.08.2024 Heard Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶2This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Page No.# 2/2

(BNSS), 2023 for granting regular bail to the petitioners, who were arrested in connection with Sipajhar P.S. Case No.102/2024.

¶3A truck bearing Registration No. As-01-HC-4341 which was loaded with valuable articles worth lakhs of rupees was going towards Tezpur. At about 11 P.M., the truck was stopped near Baihata Chariali. The entire load of the truck was shifted to another truck and the culprits fled away with the said truck.

¶4Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the day of occurrence, the petitioner Rezzak Malik, who is a driver by profession was waiting at Jalukbari and two persons, namely, Sobur and Rustom Ali had hired his car for going to Mangaldoi. On the way to Mangaldoi, the car was stopped by Police then he called his younger brother, the petitioner Rajibul Mallik and both were arrested by Police in this case.

¶5From the contents of the Case Diary, Mr. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that this type of incidents are very common at night in the National Highway. Mr. Parasar has pointed out that a gang using cars and trucks stop vehicles on the road and they loot the goods of the truck.

¶6According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, there are sufficient incriminating materials in the Case Diary.

¶7I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both the sides.

¶8This Court is of the opinion that Police investigation is going on at this stage and some people are yet to be arrested.

¶9Therefore at this stage, the bail prayers of the petitioners are not found to be satisfactory.

¶10Therefore, the bail application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly.

¶11Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010148822024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2184/2024 REZZAK MALLIK AND ANR. S/O BILLAL MALLIK @ BILAL MALLIK R/O PAZARBHANGA P.O. BARGHOL, P.S. BARPETA, IN THE DISTRICT OF BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781302 2: RAJIBUL MALLIK S/O BILLAL MALLIK @ BILLAK ALI R/O PAZARBHANGA P.O. BARGHOL P.S. BARPETA IN THE DISTRICT OF BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78130 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HUSSAIN, MR. A K HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.