VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Shahjahan Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 October 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2191/2024

Judgment

ORDER 23-10-2024 Heard Mr. A A Dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.

¶2By this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Shahjahan Ali, son of late Abdul Rahman, resident of village-Borbori, Page No.# 2/3 Ward No. 6, P.S.-Laharighat has prayed for his bail in connection with Laharighat Police Station Case No. 82/2024 registered under Section 22(C) of the NDPS Act, corresponding to G.R. No. 502/2024 arising out of G.D. Entry No. 395 dated 19.04.2024, in which he was arrested on 20.04.2024 and is in custody since then.

¶3As per the FIR of the case, on receipt of specific information at around 5:30 PM on

19.04.2024 that large quantity of NDPS items were being carried by the petitioner, police authorities from Laharighat Police Station with due empowerment proceeded to the place of occurrence for recovery and to apprehend the accused person vide Laharighat P.S. G.D. Entry No. 395 dated 19.04.2024. On reaching Laharighat Bazar in the evening at 5:30 PM, police personnel detained the petitioner and during interrogation the petitioner led them to the backyard of his house and showed them the concealed NDPS substances that he kept in his grocery shop in a black colour plastic carry bag from which (i) 20 bottles of Triprolidine Hydrochloride & Codeine Phosphat Syrup mono caff plus cough syrup (100 ml) containing Codeine Phosphat (100 ml of 20 Nos.) plastic bottles and (ii) NRX Nitrazepam Tablets I.P. 10 mg Elza-10=11 Nos. of strips containing 10 tablets each were seized from the possession of the petitioner.

¶4The petitioner was accordingly apprehended. Later, Sub-Inspector of Police, Laharighat Police Station lodged the FIR of the case on 19.04.2024 at around 9:35 PM.

¶5The petitioner was arrested on 20.04.2024 in said Laharighat P.S. Case No. 82/2024 registered under Section 22(C) of the NDPS Act and was produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon, Assam on 20.04.2024.

¶6Mr. P Borthakur, learned APP, Assam has submitted that he has received the Case Diary.

¶7On being enquired, Mr. P Borthakur, learned APP, Assam has submitted that he tried to contact the authorities in the Laharighat Police Station to enquire as to whether any Charge-Sheet has been filed in said Laharighat P.S. Case No. 82/2024 or not, but he could not contact them over phone.

¶8Since 20.04.2024 till date, the petitioner has been in custody for 186 days.

¶9As the concerned police authorities of Laharighat Police Station have not filed Charge-Page No.# 3/3 Sheet in the case till date, the petitioner is entitled for his default bail in said Laharighat P.S. Case No. 82/2024.

¶10Considering the above, the petitioner, namely, Shahjahan Ali is granted default bail in said Laharighat P.S. Case No. 82/2024 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two local sureties each of the like amount, of which both shall be government (either state government or central government) employees to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon on conditions that he – (i) shall appear before the Investigating Officer of said Laharighat P.S. Case No. 82/2024 as and when required, (ii) shall surrender his passport, if any, before the learned CJM, Morigaon on or before 29.10.2024, (iii) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Laharighat Police Station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the case, (iv) shall not hamper with the investigation or tamper with the evidence of the case; (v) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (vi) he shall not involve himself in any criminal activities.

¶11Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions by the petitioner, named above, the bail granted to him in the aforementioned P.S. Case shall stand automatically vacated.

¶12Return the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010148992024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2191/2024 SHAHJAHAN ALI S/O LATE ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILL- BORBORI, W/NO. 6 P.O. AND P.S. LAHARIGHAT, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R RONGMEI, MR H A RASHID,MR A A DEWAN,MS. K L R YANTHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.