Gopayjit Das v. The State of Assam and 2 Ors

ORDER

22.07.2024

¶1Heard Mr. M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the PWD.

¶2The petitioner's grievance is that despite executing a number of works under the respondent no.3, the petitioner has not been paid his bills amounting to Rs.2,17,228/-.

¶3Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the PWD submits that after verification of the claim made by the petitioner, it was found that the petitioner is liable to be paid the admitted amount of Rs.2,17,228/-.

¶4In view of the stand taken by the respondents that they are liable to pay to the above admitted amount, the respondents should pay the same to the petitioner within a period of 4 (four) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶5The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010149282020 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:ooWP(C)/4465/2020 GOPAYJIToDAS S/O-oLT.oRAMESHoCHANDRAoDAS oR/O-oWARDoNO.o4 oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oTANGLA oDIST.-oUDALGURI oBTAD oASSAM oPIN-o784521. oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORS REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oPUBLICoWORKSoROADSoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-o6. 2:THEoCHIEFoENGINEER PUBLICoWORKSoROADSoDEPTT. oGOVT.oOFoASSAM oCHANDMARI oGHY-o3. o3:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEER PUBLICoWORKSoROADSoDEPTT. oMANGALDAIoANDoDALGAONoTERRITORIALoROADoDIVISION oMANGALDAI. o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMR.oSoKoDEKA Advocateoforo:oSC oPWDoappearingoforoTHEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORS ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA