Najim Uddin @ Md. Najim Uddin v. The State of Assam

ORDER Date : 04.07.2023 Heard Mr. D. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/4

¶2The bail application has been preferred by the petitioner, namely, Najim Uddin @ Md. Najim Uddin seeking bail in connection with Bihpuria P.S. Case No. 96/2023 (G.R. Case No. 506/2023) registered under Sections 120(B)/406/420/489-A/489-C/489-D/34 of IPC. The petitioner was arrested on

14.06.2023 and since then he has been in custody.

¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an FIR dated 24.05.2023 was lodged by the informant, one Sri Dimbeswar Konch, who is the S/I under the Bihpuria Police Station. It is stated that the petitioner is not named accused in the FIR. However, during the course of the investigation it is submitted that a fake gold like counterfeit statue of Jesu Christ and fake gold boat was recovered from the premises of the petitioner. During the investigation several other persons have been arrested. It is submitted that Co-Ordinate Benches of this Court has already released the other co-accused, who were arrested, on bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery of fake Indian currency has been made from the possession of the petitioner.

¶4The case dairy is available in connection with Bail Application No. 2334/2023.

¶5Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties and upon due perusal of the case diary and also the orders passed by the Co-Ordinate Benches of this Court, this Court is of the view that the prayer for grant of bail can be allowed. No materials are noticed from the case diary to suggest that Page No.# 3/4 release of the petitioner on bail will hamper the progress of investigation of the case carried on. Accordingly, the bail petition is allowed.

¶6The petitioner is directed to be released on bail forthwith subject to executing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) only with one local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhimpur. The bail, granted however, subject to the following conditions:-

i) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the police and cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required, till completion of investigation.

ii) The petitioner shall not change his residence or place of business, without prior written permission from the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhimpur.

iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner; and

iv) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person/witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer in connection to this Police Station Case. Page No.# 4/4

¶7If any of the conditions are found to be violated by the petitioner then the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the accused.

¶8With the above direction, the bail petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010149572023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2356/2023 NAJIM UDDIN @ MD. NAJIM UDDIN S/O- RESAT ALI, R/O- VILL.- MOHGHULI, GARCHIGA, P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, P.O. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, SUB-DIVN- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM (SINCE THE PETITIONER IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY 14-06-2023), HENCE, HE REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THEIR RELATIVE FAKAR UDDIN AHMED, S/O- KHEJUR ALI, R/O- VILL.- RESERVE GAON, P.O. SONAPUR, P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR DEBA SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA