- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 July 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 691/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 30.07.2024
Heard Mr. P. Das, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/2 Mr. P. Das, learned counsel for the applicant, has submitted that the present application has been filed praying for correction of the Cause Title of the AB No. 1920/2024, wherein inadvertently Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been quoted instead of the appropriate Section under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 and accordingly prayed for correction of the same. In this context, P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, raised no objection. Accordingly, the present Interlocutory Application stands allowed and the Section, under which AB No. 1920/2023 has been filed, shall be read as application under Section 482 BNSS. In terms of above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010151282024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/691/2024 KANGKAN RAJBONGSHI, S/O BANDHU RAM RAJBONGSHI R/O VILL- PUNIA P.S. TAMULPUR DIST. TAMULPUR, BTR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. NAMRATA BARUAH, MR. N RAJBANGSHI,MR K J PATHAK,A DAS,MS N BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.