- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 August 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 713/2024
Judgment
ORDER
09.08.2024
Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. By this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant has prayed for condoning the delay of 23 days in preferring the connected Criminal Page No.# 2/2 revision petition against the Judgment and Order, dated 04.04.2023 passed by the learned Session Judge, Udalguri in connection with Criminal Appeal No. 10/2023, partially affirming the judgment of the trial court in PR Case No. 822/2021. The grounds of delay as stated in the petition are found to be satisfactory. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has made no objection in the matter of condoning the delay. Accordingly, the delay of 23 days is hereby condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected Criminal Revision and list the same for admission. This interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010151522024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/713/2024 ABDUL MATLEB S/O MAHIZUL HOQUE R/O ROWTA BAGAN P.O. AND P.S. ROWTA DIST. UDALGURI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U P CHALIHA, MD. I AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.