Partha Kumar Nath v. The State of Assam and 7 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010152792024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2312/2024o In0WA0No.8566/20240(Filing0Number) PARTHAoKUMARoNATHo SONoOFoPRODIPoKUMARoNATH,oRESIDENToOFoAJACHAKoPALLY,oWARDoNO. 1,oHAILAKANDI,oP.O.oANDoDIST.-oHAILAKANDI,oASSAM,oPIN-o788151. VERSUSo

1.THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo7oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oDEPARTMENToOFoHOUSINGoANDoURBANo AFFAIRS,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-6. 2:THEoADDITIONALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oHOUSINGoANDoURBANoAFFAIRSoDEPARTMENT oDISPURoGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoDIRECTOR oMUNICIPALoADMINISTRATION oDISPURoGUWAHATI-6. 4:THEoDIRECTOR oTOWNoANDoCOUNTRYoPLANNING o0DISPURoGUWAHATI-6. 5:THEoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONERoHAILAKANDI oP.O.oANDoDISTRICT-oHAILAKANDI oASSAMoPIN-o788151. 6:THEoEXECUTIVEoOFFICER oHAILAKANDIoMUNICIPALoBOARD oP.O.oANDoDISTRICT-oHAILAKANDI oASSAMoPIN-o788151. Page No.# 2/3 7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TECHNICAL CELL HAILAKANDI MUNICIPAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS (DOHUA) P.O. AND DISTRICT-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151. 8:THE CHAIRMAN HAILAKANDI MUNICIPAL BOARD P.O. AND DISTRICT-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. P.K. Roychoudhury, Advocate.

: Mr. H.I. Choudhury, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Das, Government Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.1 to 7. : Ms. A. Begum, Advocate for respondent No.8. – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

21.10.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

As per office report, notice issued to the respondent No.8 has been duly served. The other respondents have already been served. Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate has appeared for respondent Nos.1 to 7 and Ms. A. Begum, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.8. Service of notice is, therefore, complete. The instant Interlocutory Application is filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Having gone through the contents of the Interlocutory Application and after hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Page No.# 3/3 Hence, the Interlocutory Application is allowed and the delay of 22 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 2(two) weeks. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant