Shahin Shah Alom and Anr v. The State of Assam

ORDER Date : 16.09.2024 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3

¶2By this application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, the accused petitioners namely, Shahin Shah Alom and Nurul Islam Sikdar, have prayed for bail in connection with Nagaon P.S.

Case

No.

707/2024

under

Section 61(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(1)/340(2) of BNS Act r/w Section 66(c)/66(D) of IT Act and Section 25(1)(A) of Arms Act.

¶3It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been detained in custody since 59 days since their arrest on

20.07.2024. The offence as alleged against the petitioners, the mandatory period of detention is 60 days as because the pistol was seized from another co-accused namely, Furkan Ali. It is further submitted that the provision of Arms Act is not attracted against the petitioners. Considering the length of detention, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶4Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has produced the case diary and submits that considering the nature of offence as well as period of detention, bail may be considered.

¶5I have considered the submissions made by the parties. I have also perused the case diary.

¶6Considering the background of the case as well as length of detention of the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No. 707/2024 under Section 61(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(1)/340(2) of BNS Act r/w Section 66(c)/66(D) of IT Act and Section 25(1)(A) of Arms Act, on furnishing Page No.# 3/3 bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two suitable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Nagaon, Assam.

¶8The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioners:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned CJM, Nagaon, Assam without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(c) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case.

¶9In the view of the above, the bail application stands disposed of.

¶10Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010153842024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2249/2024 SHAHIN SHAH ALOM AND ANR S/O MD. AYUB ALI, P/R/O VILL- MAH CHARAGAON, P.S.-KACHUMARA, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 2: NURUL ISLAM SIKDAR S/O MD. ABDUS SALAM SIKDAR P/R/O VILL- SUNDARPARA PART NO. 3 P.S.-FAKIRAGANJ DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, MR. M AHMED,MS S AHMED,MS F INTAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI