Jarow Basumatary v. Jagadish Prasad Brahma

ORDER Date : 10.01.2024

None appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. S. Chutia, learned counsel appears for the sole respondent has referred to the affidavit filed by the said authority and contended that the Director conducted an enquiry therein and it was found that the petitioners were appointed against the non-existent post and Page No.# 2/2 their services were terminated vide order dated 12.11.2004. It is also further contended that the payments due to the petitioner was paid till the date of termination and no arrears exists thereon. In view of the said position, I am of the view that there is no willful and deliberation violation of the direction passed by this Court vide order dated 20.09.2019 in WP(C) 7095/2017 and accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154092020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/512/2020 JAROW BASUMATARY W/O SRI KEDAR BASUMATARY, R/O VILL. NIZLAGURI, P.O. SHANTIPUR, DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN-783375 VERSUS JAGADISH PRASAD BRAHMA DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR (BTAD), P.O. KOKRAJHAR, PIN-783370, DIST KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR A CHALIHA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR