VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Saddam Hussain v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
11 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2271/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 12.08.2024

Heard Mr. A. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶2By this application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, the accused petitioner namely, Md. Saddam Hussain, has prayed Page No.# 2/3 for bail in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 614/2024 under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act.

¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been detained in custody for last 57 days since his arrest on 18.06.2024. It is also submitted that the contraband which was recovered from the possession of the petitioner is intermediate quantity. Considering the background of the case as well as the length of detention, petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶4Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has produced the case diary and submits that intermediate quantity of contraband was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, FSL report has not been received. Therefore, he has prayed that at this stage, bail may not be considered to the petitioner.

¶5I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the case diary.

¶6It appears that intermediate quantity of contraband was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the length of detention as well as the nature of offence as alleged in the FIR, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 614/2024 under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two suitable sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2 cum Special Judge, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, Assam.

¶8The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2 cum Special Judge, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, Assam without prior written permission Page No.# 3/3 from him/her;

(b) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(c) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case.

¶9In the view of the above, the bail application stands disposed of.

¶10Send back the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010154892024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2271/2024 MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O MD. ABDUL HAMID, R/O 51, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI, P.O.-PANJABARI, PIN-781037, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR ARINDAM BARUAH, MS LUBNA CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.