VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Azadul Islam v. The State of Assam and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
8 August 2024
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 3952/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 09.08.2024

Heard Mr. A. A. R. Karim, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner. Mr. S. Sarma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of all the respondents.

¶2The case of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner had lodged an FIR which was registered as Chapar P.S. Case No. 107/2024 dated 08.07.2024 under Sections 365/342/376/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 4/17 of the POCSO Act, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 309/2024 at Chapar in the district of Dhubri. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent authorities have not taken any steps to properly investigate the said crime properly and have also not taken due action against the accused. Under such circumstances the petitioner had also submitted a representation to the respondent No. 2 for taking due action which however has not been taken. In that view of the matter, the petitioner had approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition.

¶3The law is well settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs State of U.P. and others reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409, which is also followed by various other judgements of the Supreme Court that a writ petition ought not to be entertained in view of the expressed provision under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being available. Under such Page No.# 3/3 circumstances, this Court would not like to entertain the instant writ petition.

¶4Be that as it may, the petitioner herein would be at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 if the petitioner is aggrieved by the investigation so carried out by the concerned Investigating Officer of Chapar PS Case No.107/2024.

¶5It is however observed that in such circumstances if the petitioner files such application in accordance with law, the concerned Magistrate shall duly consider the same as per the extant law.

¶6With the above observation and direction the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010154912024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3952/2024o AZADULoISLAMo S/O-oAYUBoALI,oRESIDENToOFoHATIPOTAoPART-II,oP.O.oHATIPOTA,oP.S.o CHAPAR,oDIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM,oPIN-o783348 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo TOoBEoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oHOMEoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI,o PIN-o781006 2:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oP.O.oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oASSAM oPIN-o781007 3:THEoINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oP.O.oULUBARI oGUWAHATI oASSAM oPIN-o781007 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oDHUBRI oP.O.oANDoP.S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783301 5:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oDHUBRI Page No.# 2/3 P.O. AND P.S. DHUBRI DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301 6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE CHAPAR POLICE STATION P.O. AND P.S. CHAPAR DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78334 Advocate for the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.A.R Karim Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. S. Sarma BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.