Pradyut Konwar v. The State of Assam

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010155882024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2041/2024o PRADYUToKONWARo S/OoLATEoPHANIDHARoKONWAR,oR/OoVILL-oBORGURI,oP.O.-BORGURI,oP.S.- TINSUKIA,oDIST-oTINSUKIA,oASSAM,oPIN-786125 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oKoBORUAH,oMS.oPoBORAH,MR.oMoALAMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkR o

19.08.2024 o Heard Ms. P. Borah, the learned appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/2

¶2This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for pre-arrest bail in respect of Dholla P.S. Case No.15/2024, under Sections 61(2)/366(3)/340(2)/316(5)/318(4) of the Indian Penal Code (corresponding to G.R. No.90/2024).

¶3The informant applied for Mudra Loan in the name of Nath Furniture from Punjab National Bank, Dholla Branch. He was yet to receive the loan but on

09.07.2023, the Punjab National Bank, Dholla Branch called him to pay an interest of Rs.36,000/-. The informant was shocked because he was yet to receive the loan. Subsequently, he came to know that his application was used to approve loan in favour of the S.K. Enterprise and accordingly an amount of Rs.10,000,00/- (Rupees Ten Lakh) was sanctioned and disbursed in favour of the S.K. Enterprise.

¶4The case diary reveals horrible facts about the conduct of the present petitioner. Under the given facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Pradyut Knowar does not deserve to be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. His application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant