- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 September 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 2089/2024
Judgment
ORDER 06-09-2024 Heard Mr. T. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
¶2The petitioners, namely, (1) Md. Tajnur Ali, (2) Najrul Islam, (3) Rafikul Islam and (4) Irshad Ali apprehending their arrest in Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024 registered under Sections 61(2)/303(2) of the BNS, read with Section 13 (1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021, read with Section 11 (1) (a) (b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 has filed this pre-arrest bail application under Section 438 CrPC, seeking pre-arrest bail.
¶3Perused the case diary relating to said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024, placed before the Court today by Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam.
¶4Matter relates to recovery of Bulls, Cows and Cattle from various places in the District of Morigaon and transportation of such cattle in a cruel manner in vehicles, transporting them outside the State of Assam, where, those cattle were suspected to be stolen from various places of Morigaon District.
¶5It is also seen that investigation of said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024 is still going and some of the persons have already been arrested in said Jagiroad P.S. Case. However, statement of the witnesses, so far recorded by the concerned Investigating Officer of the case does not implicate the petitioners' involvement in said Jagiroad P.S. Case.
¶6Considering the above and the materials in the case diary, the Court is of the view that custodial detention of the petitioners are not warranted to investigate the said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024. As such, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioners is accepted. Page No.# 3/3
¶7The petitioner No.4, namely, Irshad Ali is already on interim bail in said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024 granted to him earlier on 12.08.2024 and the same is hereby made absolute in the similar terms and conditions as specified in the said order dated
12.08.2024.
¶8Further, it is provided that, in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely, (1) Md. Tajnur Ali, (2) Najrul Islam and (3) Rafikul Islam in said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on conditions that the petitioners (i) shall appear before the Investigating Officer of said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024, as and when they are required for necessary investigation of said Jagiroad PS Case; (ii) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Jagiroad police station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the case; (iii) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case and (iv) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
¶9Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions by the petitioners, named above, the pre-arrest bail granted to them in said Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 139/2024 shall stand automatically vacated.
¶10This pre-arrest bail application accordingly stands disposed of.
¶11Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010158732024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2089/2024o MDoTAJNURoALIo S/OoBASHIRoALIo R/OoVILL-oPATUAKATAo P.S.oMIKIRBHETAo DIST.oMORIGAON,oASSAM 2:oNAJRULoISLAM oS/OoIBRAHIMoKHALILo R/OoVILL-oNO.o1oBHELKARo P.S.oHAJO oDIST.oKAMRUP oASSAM 3:oRAFIKULoISLAM oS/OoMANSURoALIo R/OoVILL-oKOACHGAONo P.S.oRUPOHIo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAM 4:oIRSHADoALI oS/OoSAMARoALIo R/OoVILL-oFALIHAMARIoPATHAR oP.S.oBHURAGAON oDIST.oMORIGAON oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoLD.oPP,oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MR. T CHUTIA,R L CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.