VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mir Hussain and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2344/2024

Judgment

ORDER

31.08.2024

¶1Heard learned counsel Mr. N. Ahmed for the petitioners namely (i) Mir Page No.# 2/3 Hussain, and (ii) Sahar Ali.

¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for bail as they are behind bars since 13.07.2024 in connection with Boko Police Station Case No. 320/2024 under Section 21(b)/29 of the NDPS Act.

¶3Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection stating that FSL report has not been forwarded along with the Case Diary, and so bail cannot be considered. It is also submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioners who are habitual drug peddlers.

¶5I have scrutinized the Case Diary. Indeed there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioners.

¶6I have considered the length of detention. Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation. The petitioners have pledged to co-operate with the remaining part of investigation, and to abide by any stringent bail conditions, if imposed upon them.

¶7Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Amingaon under the conditions that:

(i) The petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, Page No.# 3/3

(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every fortnight till completion of investigation, and

(iii) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission.

¶8On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶9In terms of the above observation, Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010159122024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2344/2024 MIR HUSSAIN AND ANR S/O SUNU MIYA, R/O VILL- GORIASUTLA, P.S.-SARTHEBARI, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM 2: SAHAR ALI S/O LATE ARAN ALI R/O VILL- GORIASUTLA P.S.-SARTHEBARI DIST-BARPETA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, MR. M M ZAMAN,MR G P CHETIA,MR N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.