- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 May 2023
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- WP(C) 4874/2018
Judgment
ORDER
16.05.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. AZ Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India and Mr. G Sharma, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (B) Kamrup (M) as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Kamrup (M).
¶2The petitioner, namely, Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal 4th Kamrup(M) Assam for rendering an opinion as to whether he is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after Page No.# 3/5
25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of F.T. Case No.FT(G-4)371/16 wherein an opinion dated 29.06.2018 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.
¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.
¶4The petitioner relies upon the voters list of 1966 of village Barkalia Goladigi which contains the name of Kurban Ali Miah son of Mohammad Munshi at Sl.No.342. Reliance is also placed on the voters list of 1989 of village Barkalia Goladigi which contains the name of Kurban Ali son of Mohammad at Sl.No.250 and that of Aymona Khatun wife of Kurban at Sl.No.251 along with Sahid Ali son of Kurban at Sl.No.252 and all the three are shown to be residing in the same House No.281. It is claimed that Sahid Ali, son of Kurban of the 1989 voters list of village Barkalia Goladigi is the writ petitioner/proceedee himself. If Sahid Ali, son of Kurban of 1989 voters list of village Barkalia Goladigi and the writ petitioner/proceedee Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali are one and the same person, the petitioner may have discharged the burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act 1946 to prove that he is a citizen of India.
¶5Accordingly, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to examine as to whether Sahid Ali, son of Kurban of 1989 voters list of village Barkalia Goladigi and the writ petitioner/proceedee Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali are one and the same person.
Page No.# 4/5
¶6The respondents in the Home Department may also make their own verification on the aforesaid question as to whether Sahid Ali, son of Kurban of 1989 voters list of village Barkalia Goladigi and the writ petitioner/proceedee Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali are one and the same person and submit a report before the Tribunal, if so advised.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 30.06.2023.
¶8The petitioner may also produce the complete voters list of the years 1966 to 1989 of village Barkalia Goladigi to establish his case.
¶9The Tribunal upon doing the needful and after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the opinion dated
29.06.2018 of the Foreigners Tribunal 4th Kamrup(M) Assam in F.T. Case No.FT(G-4)371/16 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.
¶10Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.
¶11Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
¶12Send back the LCR. Page No.# 5/5
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010159622018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/4874/2018o SAHIDoALIo@oMD.oSAHIDoALIo S/O.oKURPANoALIo@oKURPANoALIoMIYAo@oMD.oKURBANoALIo@oMD.o KURBANoALIoMIYA,oVILL.oBORKALIAoGOLADIGI,oP.S.oFAKIRGANJ,oDIST.o DHUBRIo(AToPRESENToSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR). VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o TOoBEoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,o DEPTT.oOFo(HOMEoAFFAIRS),oNEWoDELHI,oINDIA.oPINo110001 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oTOoBEoREP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARY oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oDEPTT.oOFoHOME oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oKAMRUP(M) oGUWAHATI oASSAM. 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERoOFoPOLICEo(B)o(D.C.P.oFORoSHORT) oKAMRUP(M) oGUWAHATI-6. 5:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oTOoBEoREP.oBYoTHEoCHIEFoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoASHOKAoROAD Page No.# 2/5 NEW DELHI INDIA. 110001 6:THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZEN TO BE REP. BY THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR ASYUT PLAZA BHANGAGARH KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. PIN 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L R MAZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.