- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 August 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 2100/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 12.08.2024
Heard Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. H. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶2This is an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, praying for anticipatory bail in connection with Rangiya P.S. Case No. 209/2024. Page No.# 2/2
¶3One Sahista Taskin, the sister-in-law of the present petitioner lodged an FIR before Police alleging that on 29.07.2024, the petitioner and his family members have gone to their house. They caused damage to household properties and also assaulted Mijanur Rahman, the father of the informant.
¶4Mr. Choudhury has submitted that the present petitioner is a LL.B student, whereas his wife Jemima Yeasmin, the daughter of the aforementioned Mijanur Rahman is a HSLC student. They married on 14.03.2023.
¶5Mr. Choudhury has submitted that the petitioner being the husband of the said lady had gone to her house on her invitation and they had some incidents. For that matter, the petitioner had filed an FIR before the Police. The case has been registered by Police.
¶6Mr. Das submits that for consideration of the bail prayer, Case Diary will be required.
¶7After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel of both the sides, this Court is of the opinion that this is a dispute between the husband and wife. Therefore, the Case Diary is not required.
¶8The petitioner Injamul Haque does not deserve to be detained in custody for this offence. His pre-arrest bail is allowed.
¶9It is hereby directed that in connection with Rangiya P.S. Case No. 209/2024, the petitioner Injamul Hoque shall be released on bail of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount with the satisfaction of the arresting Authority.
¶10The petitioner shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer, as and when required.
¶11With the aforesaid direction, the application for bail is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010160732024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2100/2024 INJAMUL HOQUE S/O LATE MOJIB ALI, RESIDENT OF MURARA, WARD NO. 3, PO AND PS RANGIA, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S H SIKDAR, MR. S HAQUE,MD IMRAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.