- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 August 2023
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- WP(C) 4262/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 04-08-2023 Heard Mr. A.M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1 – 7.
¶2The petitioners, 4 [four] in nos., are licensees of Fair Price Shops [FPSs] Page No.# 3/4 under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles [APDA] Order, 1982. The primary grievance of the petitioners is that their licences were suspended by the respondent no. 3 with immediate effect, pending drawal of proceedings, by an Order dated 10.11.2022 on the strength of an enquiry report. The petitioners' contention is that the enquiry caused by the Superintendent of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, BIEO, Assam was an ex-parte enquiry. Subsequently on 06.02.2023, the petitioners were served with a show cause notice asking them to show cause as to why action for cancellation of their licences should not be taken for violation of various clauses of the APDA Order, 1982 and terms and conditions of the licences, indicated therein. On receipt of the show cause notice, all the petitioners had submitted a joint reply on
07.02.2023. Despite elapse of more than 6 [six] months from submission of the joint reply, the respondent authorities have not brought the enquiry proceedings, drawn up against the petitioners, to logical conclusion. It is, thus, contended that prolonged suspension has caused prejudice to the petitioners as the Fair Price Shops run by the petitioners are essential for their livelihood.
¶3Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam has submitted that since proceedings have already been initiated by the show cause notice dated 06.02.2023 and are pending since then, the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the Licensing Authority i.e. the respondent no. 3 to bring the proceedings, initiated against the petitioners, to its logical conclusion by passing a speaking order within a reasonable time period.
¶4Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner has agreed to the submission of Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate.
¶5In view of the broad consensus arrived at by the learned counsel for the Page No.# 4/4 parties in the afore-stated manner, this Court is of the considered view that instead of keeping the writ petition pending, the same can be disposed of with a direction to the Licensing Authority i.e. the respondent no. 3 to bring the proceedings initiated against the petitioners with the show cause notice dated
06.02.2023 to logical conclusion as per the procedure prescribed in the APDA Order, 1982 as expeditiously as possible.
¶6Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate has submitted that an outer limit of 2 [two] months would be a reasonable period for the Licensing Authority to complete the proceedings, if the same have not yet been brought to its end. It is, therefore, directed to the Licensing Authority to bring the enquiry proceedings initiated against the petitioners by the show cause notice dated 06.02.2023 to conclusion by passing a speaking order within a period of 2 [two] months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order from the petitioners at his office.
¶7This order disposes of the writ petition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010160992023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/4262/2023o JAYFULoNESSAoANDo3oORS.o W/O-oABDULoBATENoAHMED VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo7oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o DEPARTMENToOFoFOOD,oCIVILoSUPPLIESoANDoCONSUMERoAFFAIRS,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI-06 2:THEoDIRECTOR o oFOODoCIVILoSUPPLIESoANDoCONSUMERoAFFAIRS oASSAMo oBHANGAGARH oGUWAHATI-05 oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oDIST-oBARPETA oASSAM 4:THEoSUPDDT.oOFoFCSoANDoCA oBIo(EO) oASSAM oASSAM oSRIMANTAPUR oGUWAHATI-32 5:THEoDEPUTYoDIRECTOR Page No.# 2/4 FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS BARPETA ASSAM 6:THE SUPPLY INSPECTOR FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS BARPETA ASSAM 7:THE AREA OFFICER FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS BARPETA ASSAM 8:THE SECRETARY M/S- BAGHMARA CHAR GPSS LIMITED VILL- BAGHMARA P.O- BAGHMARA P.S- ALOPATI CHAR DIST- BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.