- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 August 2023
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2584/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 14-08-2023
Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. I.U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application made under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail by the accused-petitioners, namely, 1) Billal Uddin, 2) Abdul Karim, 3) Afaj Uddin & 4) Nasir Hossain, in connection with Murajhar Police Station Case No. 162/2023, registered under Sections 120B/342/370(4)/372 IPC read with Section 75 of Juvenile Justice Act read with Section 6 of POCSO Act. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners that the allegations against the petitioners is that they have only pressurized the complainant not to lodge the FIR and settled the matter in the village level and there is no allegation against the co-accused/ petitioners under section 6 of the POCSO Act or under section 370 and 372 of IPC. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners are innocent and falsely implicated in the instant case. As they are no way connected with the alleged offence and have been detained in custody for last forty days (since
04.07.2023) and prays that considering the length of detention of the accused-petitioners, bail may be granted to them. Page No.# 3/4 Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has also admitted that the allegations against the present petitioners is that they had pressurized the complainant not to lodge the FIR and settle the matter on payment of Rs. 2,00,000/-. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the case diary. Considering the allegations made in the FIR as well as the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not warranted in the instant case. Accordingly, the accused-petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Murajhar Police Station Case No. 162/2023, registered under Sections 120B/342/370(4)/372 IPC read with Section 75 of Juvenile Justice Act read with Section 6 of POCSO Act, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(Thirty Thousand) each with two suitable sureties each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Hojai. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioners:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Hojai, without prior written permission from him/her;
(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;
(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or Page No.# 4/4 promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
(d) shall appear before the Investigating Police Officer once in a week for six weeks after their release on bail as and when called upon by the Investigating Police Officer till the investigation of the case is completed. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010161332023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./2584/2023o BILLALoUDDINoANDo3oORS.o S/OoLATEoABDULoHELIMo R/OoJAMUNAoMOUDANGAoKRISHIPAMoNIGAM,oP.S.oMURAJHARo DIST.oHOJAI,oASSAM 2:oABDULoKARIM oS/OoYAKUBoALIo R/OoJAMUNAoMOUDANGAoKRISHIPAMoNIGAM oP.S.oMURAJHARo DIST.oHOJAI oASSAM 3:oAFJALoUDDIN oS/OoLT.oABDULoSATTARo R/OoJAMUNAoMOUDANGAoKRISHIPAMoNIGAM oP.S.oMURAJHARo DIST.oHOJAI oASSAM 4:oNASHIRoHOSSAIN oS/OoLATEoABDULoSUBHANoMIRo R/OoJAMUNAoMOUDANGAoKRISHIPAMoNIGAM oP.S.oMURAJHARo DIST.oHOJAI oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo TOoBEoREP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoHoRoAoCHOUDHURYo Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.