VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jaffar Alam @ Jafar Alam v. The Union of India

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
18 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2439/2024

Judgment

ORDER

19.08.2024

Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Bharadwaj, learned standing counsel, NIA. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 prayed for grant of bail in connection with Special NIA Case No. 01/2024 arising out of RC-01/2023/NIA-GUW, STF PS Case No. 12/2023 registered under Sections 120B,121A,153A(1)/153B / 465/471/295A/109/307 IPC, R/W Section 14A(b) of Foreigners Act, 1946, R/W Section 12(1)(a)/12(1A)(a)(b)/12(2) of Passport Act added Section 17, 18, 18(B) of UA(P) Act. Page No.# 2/3 Mr. D. Bharadwaj, learned standing counsel, NIA submits that this application is not maintainable as per section 21 of NIA Act. I have considered the submission of learned counsel for both the parties also perused the order of the Special Judge, NIA, Assam, Guwahati wherefrom it appears that on 05.07.2024 the bail application preferred by the petitioner before the Special Judge, NIA in connection with Special NIA Case No. 01/2024 was rejected. Section 21 of NIA Act is reproduced as follows- " (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code, an appeal shall lie from any judgment, sentence or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Special Court to the High Court both on facts and on law.

(2) Every appeal under sub-section (1) shall be heard by a bench of two Judges of the High Court and shall, as far as possible, be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of admission of the appeal.

(3)Except as aforesaid, no appeal or revision shall lie to any Court from any judgment, sentence or order including an interlocutory order of a Special Court.

(4)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3) of section 378 of the Code, an appeal shall lie to the High Court against an order of the Special Court granting or refusing bail.

(5)Every appeal under this section shall be preferred within a period of thirty days from the date of the judgment, sentence or order appealed from: Provided that the High Court may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of thirty days if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the period of thirty days: Page No.# 3/3 Provided further that no appeal shall be entertained after the expiry of period of ninety days." In view of the above, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is not maintainable and stands dismissed. Bail application is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010162892024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2439/2024 JAFFAR ALAM @ JAFAR ALAM S/O MOHD, NAZIR @ NAZIR MOHAMMAD, R/O NEAR MECCA MASJID BHATINDI, P.S.-NASWAL, DIST- JAMMU, J AND K VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR/STANDING COUNSEL, NIA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z HUSSAIN, MR A K DAS,MR. RASHIDUL ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NIA, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.