- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 September 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- WP(C) 4109/2024
Judgment
ORDER
12.09.2024
Heard Mr. D Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. H Sarma, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, appears on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. S Dutta, the learned counsel appears for the authorities under the Revenue Department, Government of Assam.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the District Commissioner, Barpeta in not deciding the 10(ten) appeals which were filed by the petitioners on 04.05.2021 challenging the mutation orders in respect of a plot of land measuring 18 bighas 4 kathas 10 lechas covered by dag No.137 and 179 included in myadi khiraj patta No.108 situated at village Bonakuchi Mouza Barpeta in the district of Barpeta.
Page No.# 3/5
¶3This Court vide order dated 16.08.2024, issued notice and directed the State respondents to apprise this Court as to whether the appeals have been duly received by the Office of the District Commissioner, Barpeta and if so what is the status of the present appeals.
¶4On 22.08.2024, Mr. H Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the District Administration, submitted that based on the file number which was provided by the petitioner, the statutory appeals could not be located. He, however, in view of the additional affidavit filed by the petitioner and there being another file No.being BRKG-43/2020/307 submitted that he would take instruction in that regard.
¶5Today, Mr. H Sarma, the learned counsel submitted that upon enquiry being made, it came to light that there was a pleaders' notice issued by the Advocate on behalf of the petitioner on account of the inaction on the part of the respondent District Commissioner in deciding the 10(ten) appeals. In the said pleader's notice there was reference to 10(ten) appeals of which the first page of the said appeals were also enclosed. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the District Administration submitted that in view of the said first page of the appeals, it is seen that 10(ten) appeals were filed by the petitioner and were received by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta on
04.05.2021. However, they do not have the records of the said appeals. In addition to that, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the District Administration submitted that on further enquiry, it came to light that a miscellaneous case has been initiated being Misc Case No.17/2024-25 by the Circle Officer, Barpeta Revenue Circle on the basis of the pleaders notice and Page No.# 4/5 notices had been generated in that regard.
¶6This Court has duly taken note of that the appeals were filed before the District Commissioner, Barpeta challenging the mutation orders.
¶7Mr. D Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that although in the appeals it has been shown to have been filed under Section 53A of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886 (for short, the Regulations of 1886), but the said appeals ought to be construed as appeals filed under Section 147(b) of the Regulations of 1886. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that wrong quoting of the Section would not divest the jurisdiction which is otherwise vested by law.
¶8Taking into account the above submissions and the fact that appeals were duly filed on 04.05.2021, this Court is of the opinion that it is the District Commissioner or the Additional District Commissioner, who has to decide the said appeals. This Court has also taken note of that upon filing of the appeals, the matter was referred to the Circle Officer and on the basis of which, a Misc.Case being Misc.Case No.17/24-25 was initiated by the Circle Officer. The same is totally non est in law, inasmuch as, the Regulations of 1886 do not confer a power of review upon the Circle Officer.
¶9This Court has also taken note of that the Office of the District Commissioner, Barpeta had misplaced the Appeal memos. Under such circumstances, there would be a requirement of reconstruction of the Appeal memos. Accordingly, this Court, therefore, disposes of the instant writ petition Page No.# 5/5 thereby giving liberty to the petitioner within 15 (fifteen) days from today to submit a fresh memo of appeals against the mutation orders which were the subject matter of challenge in the appeals which were filed earlier. Upon filing of the said appeals within the period mentioned hereinabove, the same shall be construed to have been filed before the Office of the District Commissioner Barpeta, on 04.05.2021.
¶10The District Commissioner or the Additional District Commissioner, as the case may be shall thereupon decide the said appeals taking it as appeals filed under Section 147(b) of the Regulations of 1886 and the same be done at the earliest and preferably within a period of 6(six) months after the service of notice upon the respondents of the Appeals.
¶11Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010163682024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/4109/2024o BIPLABANANDAoCHOUDHURYo S/O-oLATEoBRAHMANANDAoCHOUDHURY,oR/O-oHOUSEoNO.o05,oAoKoAZADo ROAD,oBYEo-oLANEoNO.o1,oP.O.oREHABARI,oP.S.oPALTANBAZAR,oPIN-o781008, DIST.oKAMRUP(M),oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,o DEPARTMENToOFoLANDoRECORDSoANDoSURVEY,oASSAMoSACHIVALAYA,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI,oDIST.oKAMRUP(M),oASSAM 2:THEoDIRECTOR oDEPARTMENToOFoLANDoRECORDSoANDoSURVEY oGUWAHATI oDIST.oKAMRUP(M) oASSAM 3:THEoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oP.O. oP.S.oANDoDIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 4:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oBARPETAoREVENUEoCIRCLE oBARPETA oDIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 5:THEoLOToMANDAL oBARPETAoREVENUEoCIRCLE Page No.# 2/5 DIST. BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. D Gogoi Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. H Sarma Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam Mr. S Dutta Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, Govt. of Assam B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.