- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 August 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2417/2024
Judgment
ORDER
27.08.2024 Heard Mr A Khanikar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rana Barman, who has filed this application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 18.07.2024, in connection with Gohpur PS Case No. 110/2024, under Sections 305/317(2) of the BNS, 2023.
¶2Heard Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3
¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. The petitioner is involved in committing theft of a vehicle of KIA Seltos Model.
¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that he was found involved in theft of a KIA Seltos Model at NH-37, at night in the area of Milanpur Chariali, near Bandhan Bank.
¶5I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.
¶6Indeed there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner.
¶7I have considered the length of detention.
¶8The petitioner has also prayed for bail on the ground of parity as similarly circumstanced accused has been granted bail in connection with Bail Application No. 2386/2024, vide order dated 21.08.2024 of this Court.
¶9The petitioner is willing to cooperate with the remaining part of investigation and to abide by any stringent bail conditions, if imposed upon him.
¶10The Case Diary also reveals that investigation has progressed to a considerable extent.
¶11In view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only), with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM (M), Gohpur, under the conditions that:
(i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged,
ii) the petitioner shall cooperate with the remaining part of investigation, and
ii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court, without prior Page No.# 3/3 permission.
11.1. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.
¶12Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶13Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010164932024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2417/2024 RANA BARMAN S/O- HEIDAY BARMAN, R/O- VILLAGE- MOHISH BATTHAM, P.S AND P.O-- KAUTUWALI, DIST- COOCH BIHAR, WEST BENGAL, PIN-732144 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B DEORI, MR A KHANIKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.