- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 October 2024
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2442/2024
Judgment
ORDER
03.10.2024 Heard Mr. A. W. Aman, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge sheet in respect of the petitioner has been filed before the C.J.M., Kokrajhar and Page No.# 2/2 the C.J.M. Kokrajhar has enlarged the petitioner on bail after completion of the default period in custody. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner does not want to press this bail application any further. Accordingly, the bail application stands disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010165252024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2442/2024 AMIR HUSSAIN S/O AINAL HOQUE, P/R/O VILL- NO. 3 BHANDARA, P.S.-MANIKPUR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, SAMIM RAHMAN,MR S A BARBHUYAN,MS SURAYA RAHMAN,MR A W AMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.